UX Case Study

United Safety Hub

Bridging design systems and research insights to transform a legacy safety platform into a modern, compliant user experience

Design Systems UX Design Vendor Management Usability Testing
Timeline Aug - Sep 2025
Role UX Designer
Team EUX + Vendor
Outcome +43% Usability

Overview

United Safety Hub replaces the legacy ETQ system with a modern safety risk management platform. As the UX Designer, I ensured external vendor compliance with United's Orion design system while translating research findings into 40+ actionable design specifications for Policy Owners and SMS Representatives.

United Safety Hub Interface

The Challenge

The external vendor delivered a platform with sub-par user flows and failed to follow United's Orion design system standards.

Initial testing revealed a SUS score of 42/100—well below the industry standard of 68. Users struggled with inconsistent UI patterns, confusing terminology, and nested workflows that obscured critical actions.

Key Issues: Navigation confusion, terminology mismatches, complex nested popups, inconsistent design patterns, non-actionable error messages

I feel like it's just a reorganization of the data from ETQ… I'm not seeing a massive difference, it's all still overly complicated to me.
Modal on top of modals
Out of the box solution

My Approach

I served as the bridge between research insights and implementation, ensuring vendor accountability while maintaining design system integrity.

Research Foundation

Two rounds of moderated usability testing with 15 participants across 60-minute remote sessions provided the data foundation for design decisions.

42
Round 1
Below Industry Standard
60
▲ 42.9%
Round 2
18 Point Improvement
68
Industry Standard
Target Benchmark
42 → 60
SUS Score Improvement
+43%
Usability Increase
40+
Design Fixes

Key Activities

Round 1 (Aug 2025) 42/100
Round 2 (Sep 2025) 60/100
Industry Standard 68/100

Design Solutions

I organized findings into three priority categories, creating comprehensive specifications that addressed both UX workflows and UI inconsistencies.

Navigation Consistency
  • Single pathway to actions
  • Clear breadcrumb trails
  • Consistent navigation patterns
  • Standardized UI components
Actionable Guidance
  • Clear primary actions
  • Guided user workflows
  • Visible main pathways
  • Auto-refresh feedback
Design System Alignment
  • Consistent terminology
  • Unified button patterns
  • Standard action labels
  • Clear exit options

UI Design & Components

Data & Tables

Interaction Patterns

Sidebar navigation improvement

Impact

Between testing rounds, targeted improvements drove measurable results and shifted user sentiment from frustration to cautious optimism.

Round 1: Frustration with complexity and inconsistency
Round 2: Recognition of potential with identified refinement needs

I can see the vision. But I do think there's just a little bit of tweaks here and there.

Design System Compliance

Key Takeaways

Design systems need active governance

Documentation alone isn't enough—vendors require clear specifications, regular audits, and implementation validation to maintain consistency at scale.

Research translation is a distinct skill

Converting qualitative feedback into specific, implementable requirements demands both empathy for user needs and technical understanding of development constraints.

Iterative validation drives confidence

The 18-point SUS improvement validated our prioritization approach and demonstrated that design system compliance directly impacts user experience.

Once United rolls out a system we're stuck with it for a while. I would prefer we spend more time on this now to get it right instead of putting it out as is.

Next Project

TrialAI: AI-Powered Clinical Trials